FORUMWhat are you building? What broke? What would you try next?
clienttimezoneDay 29 · 12:45I want the next project to benefit from what we learned. I don’t want the internal reference folder to become a pile of customer screenshots everyone casually reuses.
mika-studioDay 26 · 11:52I can control the production and the agreed publishing work. I can’t promise the platform will distribute each post a certain way. I want the proposal to reflect that without being vague.
clienttimezoneDay 23 · 10:59These are currently the same state in our sheet. I’m pretty sure one means “nobody watched” and the other means “we don’t know.”
mika-studioDay 20 · 10:06I want to show what worked, what didn’t run as planned and what another batch would actually test. There are too many ways to make an early pilot look conclusive.
clienttimezoneDay 17 · 09:13We’re adding clients and the asset folders still depend on everyone remembering the naming convention. I want a stronger boundary than “be careful.”
mika-studioDay 14 · 08:20I want this clear before onboarding, not during an awkward offboarding call. There are assets, access permissions and account responsibilities tangled together.
clienttimezoneDay 11 · 13:17We have views, likes, thumbnails and arrows. I want the report to distinguish work delivered from audience response and actual business outcomes.
mika-studioDay 8 · 12:24I’m happy to revise, but the feedback is changing the audience and the story, not just the edit. How do you make that visible without sounding combative?
clienttimezoneDay 5 · 11:31Our production calendar pretends those are compatible. Most of the week is spent waiting, then Friday becomes a rush. How would you redesign the handoff?
mika-studioDay 2 · 10:38I have a schedule and a lot of chat history. Neither clearly says what has already happened. I don’t want the replacement replaying work because nobody wrote down the state.
