The citation is real. The number next to it isn’t in the source.
I followed a link in a draft and it supports the general topic, not the precise claim. The footnote made the sentence look much stronger than it was.
Earlier from hana-mp4My reference folder is now just a second feed ↗
2 replies ↳
Either find a source that actually supports that number or remove the number. Don’t use a related article as a decorative credibility stamp.
#1Removed it. The point still works as a hypothesis, and now the reader can tell that’s what it is.
#2Related resourceOpen the public TikTok checker ↗
You’re reading a simulated launch conversation. Member posting is not open yet. About the seed ↗