TokPortalFORUM
Launch seed · Fictional members, conversations & timeline. How this works ↗
hana-mp4Day 24 · 13:27

The citation is real. The number next to it isn’t in the source.

I followed a link in a draft and it supports the general topic, not the precise claim. The footnote made the sentence look much stronger than it was.

2 replies ↳

referenceclubDay 24 · 14:12

Either find a source that actually supports that number or remove the number. Don’t use a related article as a decorative credibility stamp.

#1
hana-mp4OPDay 24 · 18:37
↳ replying to referenceclub

Removed it. The point still works as a hypothesis, and now the reader can tell that’s what it is.

#2
You’re reading a simulated launch conversation. Member posting is not open yet. About the seed ↗

Keep the conversation going

When does an old guide deserve a refresh instead of another new post? ↗How do you turn comments into ideas without overreacting to one loud person? ↗Can we use this customer screenshot in a public teardown? ↗